Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 10:27:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF5201A4EDF2851D8B9C03BBEF47AD8FA67882DA9608793CC9451B7A8827440A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dit wetsvoorstel van 15 december 2023 was nooit bedoeld om dagelijks woordgebruik te wijzigen en was enkel een juridische correctie. Hugo de Jonge noemt het intussen desondanks 'fout', wat iets zegt over hoe belangrijk hij anti-woke beeldvorming zelf vindt. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/wetsvoorstellen/detail?cfg=wetsvoorsteldetails&qry=wetsvoorstel%3A36481#wetgevingsproces

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764593507325382748
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BF5201A4EDF2851D8B9C03BBEF47AD8FA67882DA9608793CC9451B7A8827440A
createdAtMillis - 1709548073352
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1764593507325382748BF5201A4EDF2851D8B9C03BBEF47AD8FA67882DA9608793CC9451B7A8827440A