Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 09:14:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DCD90AEC8AF5FFF7706305B4EC6970D218E177E146AEA9F70FD0A341B948DE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

本投稿で批判の対象になっているのはあくまで「マスコミ」そのモノで、斎藤幸平氏個人は対象で無い事は明らかです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764576007389102312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DCD90AEC8AF5FFF7706305B4EC6970D218E177E146AEA9F70FD0A341B948DE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1709543682266
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17645760073891023123DCD90AEC8AF5FFF7706305B4EC6970D218E177E146AEA9F70FD0A341B948DE7