Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 04:57:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Es geht nicht um das Urteil, sondern die Stellungnahme der correctiv Anwälte, die darlegen, dass die Berichterstattung kein Tatsachenbericht, sondern Meinung sind. Bitte die Kommentare für Diskussion verwenden.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764549660100665430
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709614651935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764549660100665430E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A