Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 13:01:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 696C29FF4320E4ECEE75CB21173FB1C489391AD68AE1AC186766C3906C0213BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Es geht nicht um das Urteil, sondern die Stellungnahme der correctiv Anwälte, die darlegen, dass die Berichterstattung kein Tatsachenbericht, sondern Meinung sind. Bitte die Kommentare für Diskussion verwenden.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764549660100665430
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 696C29FF4320E4ECEE75CB21173FB1C489391AD68AE1AC186766C3906C0213BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709557263790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764549660100665430696C29FF4320E4ECEE75CB21173FB1C489391AD68AE1AC186766C3906C0213BF