Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 13:25:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F107D9EBA54688856F14501B3B432C567ECBB44DFF46AF401A342323D0498279
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Aussagen der Recherche zum Geheimplan wurde vom Gericht nicht in Zweifel gezogen. Eine Gegendarstellung seitens Correctiv zur Hauptaussage der Recherche gab es nie. Correctiv hat vor Gericht in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. https://taz.de/Potsdamer-Remigrations-Treffen/!5992120/ https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/2024/01/12/news-geheimplan-afd-correctiv-live/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764546758854480108
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F107D9EBA54688856F14501B3B432C567ECBB44DFF46AF401A342323D0498279
createdAtMillis - 1709558756148
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1764546758854480108F107D9EBA54688856F14501B3B432C567ECBB44DFF46AF401A342323D0498279