Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 05:36:17 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA1149FEA2AD660D439EC70A162A26BEFBC4BADCF2D0AF163CCD997F0764369B
Participant Details

Original Note:

‘Activists’ didn’t demand a SC school district to ban books, but rather restrict access to certain books, deemed age and/or developmentally inappropriate in the school setting for certain age groups. The same books are still available for purchase by private individuals. https://www.wjcl.com/article/south-carolina-policy-book-ban/45845340

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764469402722832580
participantId -
raterParticipantId - AA1149FEA2AD660D439EC70A162A26BEFBC4BADCF2D0AF163CCD997F0764369B
createdAtMillis - 1709530577880
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1764469402722832580AA1149FEA2AD660D439EC70A162A26BEFBC4BADCF2D0AF163CCD997F0764369B