Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 02:44:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 577B5DC395799272B8F4C3B3ACAF85523DD8606C71316982C9A40B444039521E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post only states that the police officers responded to a call in regards to a 'gun' being visible. This is because the person who called it in believed the prop to be a gun. In regards to calling it a weapon, if it was found to have been sharp, it can be called such.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764450965040595426
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 577B5DC395799272B8F4C3B3ACAF85523DD8606C71316982C9A40B444039521E
  • createdAtMillis - 1709520281747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764450965040595426577B5DC395799272B8F4C3B3ACAF85523DD8606C71316982C9A40B444039521E