Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 03:41:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Those posting notes that he wasn't convicted are misleading and misrepresenting the note. He clearly did attempt to overthrow the results of a free and fair election. Outside of the numerous failed lawsuits.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764428560343740854
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1709610087731
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17644285603437408540A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2