Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-03 21:38:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA4EACC7C1D1BB1AAE8FEBEF91A3E452303C6D32B6F25FCCD7DF8145F7EE0916
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is factually incorrect. The Part 1 Report of the Angiolini Inquiry said “the Inquiry received no evidence to support the media report that Couzens was referred to by his colleagues as ‘The Rapist’”. This can be found on page 306 of the report. https://iipcv-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/E02740018_Angiolini-Inquiry.pdf
All Note Details