Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 21:38:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA4EACC7C1D1BB1AAE8FEBEF91A3E452303C6D32B6F25FCCD7DF8145F7EE0916
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually incorrect. The Part 1 Report of the Angiolini Inquiry said “the Inquiry received no evidence to support the media report that Couzens was referred to by his colleagues as ‘The Rapist’”. This can be found on page 306 of the report. https://iipcv-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/E02740018_Angiolini-Inquiry.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764399974031249444
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA4EACC7C1D1BB1AAE8FEBEF91A3E452303C6D32B6F25FCCD7DF8145F7EE0916
  • createdAtMillis - 1709501887534
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764399974031249444EA4EACC7C1D1BB1AAE8FEBEF91A3E452303C6D32B6F25FCCD7DF8145F7EE0916