Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 10:09:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA07CF8EEB4671621EC62D1868F300AB056CD6329B8BA27ACC757218D5EBFC1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce genre de notes apporte un + d'expliquer la situation mais, ça doit se trouver en commentaire car, cette note n'apporte pas suffisamment pour montrer que le tweet est trompeur Aussi, il s'agit d'une opinion personnelle de l'auteur du tweet demandant un référendum https://twitter.com/JeanSebbuf/status/1764361728865755425

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764376199684354135
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DA07CF8EEB4671621EC62D1868F300AB056CD6329B8BA27ACC757218D5EBFC1E
createdAtMillis - 1709546972143
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1764376199684354135DA07CF8EEB4671621EC62D1868F300AB056CD6329B8BA27ACC757218D5EBFC1E