Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 07:25:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce genre de notes apporte un + d'expliquer la situation mais, ça doit se trouver en commentaire car, cette note n'apporte pas suffisamment pour montrer que le tweet est trompeur Aussi, il s'agit d'une opinion personnelle de l'auteur du tweet demandant un référendum https://twitter.com/JeanSebbuf/status/1764361728865755425

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764376199684354135
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09
  • createdAtMillis - 1709537120794
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764376199684354135AEF4628E9624AEB8ACBD37B10248F48777122A9A5EC0861B5F9699D6C14E3C09