Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 20:29:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A810D33394D2C3C8C425D31C8990EEE88A201C4E26FF1F971536E625D1A71B45
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce genre de notes apporte un + d'expliquer la situation mais, ça doit se trouver en commentaire car, cette note n'apporte pas suffisamment pour montrer que le tweet est trompeur Aussi, il s'agit d'une opinion personnelle de l'auteur du tweet demandant un référendum https://twitter.com/JeanSebbuf/status/1764361728865755425

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764376199684354135
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A810D33394D2C3C8C425D31C8990EEE88A201C4E26FF1F971536E625D1A71B45
  • createdAtMillis - 1709497792517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764376199684354135A810D33394D2C3C8C425D31C8990EEE88A201C4E26FF1F971536E625D1A71B45