Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 14:57:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 867C18276388C82F977C3D53FD49E98BEEFC4E01E9EEBA179360D7DECCE7B0B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study mentions “correlation between influencer tweets and paper citation count” but not causation. Also, these influencers are established researchers who only tweet selected papers (likely to be impactful anyway). This post incorrectly conveys a causation effect. https://arxiv.org/html/2401.13782v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764291710434115750
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 867C18276388C82F977C3D53FD49E98BEEFC4E01E9EEBA179360D7DECCE7B0B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1709564232211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764291710434115750867C18276388C82F977C3D53FD49E98BEEFC4E01E9EEBA179360D7DECCE7B0B2