Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 01:07:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65A4376B5885D5BBDBB3D8C406586ECE530C4C5D8B09B5FFC6EB5AD216420289
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study mentions “correlation between influencer tweets and paper citation count” but not causation. Also, these influencers are established researchers who only tweet selected papers (likely to be impactful anyway). This post incorrectly conveys a causation effect. https://arxiv.org/html/2401.13782v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764291710434115750
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65A4376B5885D5BBDBB3D8C406586ECE530C4C5D8B09B5FFC6EB5AD216420289
  • createdAtMillis - 1709514469973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176429171043411575065A4376B5885D5BBDBB3D8C406586ECE530C4C5D8B09B5FFC6EB5AD216420289