Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 17:31:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F86BFD5E53C684BFF7E9860488FFAA45D133ED2CA52AC0EEF07FBEF9AEDA035E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die PM von Correctiv bezieht sich auf die Gerichtsentscheidung und dass die Rechercheergebnisse in zwei von drei vor Gericht angegriffenen Punkten bestätigt worden sind. Es handelt sich daher nicht um "Fake News". https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2024/02/27/wichtiger-erfolg-fuer-correctiv-vor-dem-landgericht-hamburg/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764224547442561251
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F86BFD5E53C684BFF7E9860488FFAA45D133ED2CA52AC0EEF07FBEF9AEDA035E
createdAtMillis - 1709487078255
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1764224547442561251F86BFD5E53C684BFF7E9860488FFAA45D133ED2CA52AC0EEF07FBEF9AEDA035E