Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 02:54:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5AB61D1DCE1D1DF54E48730BF8B3DEB7AB034189AD1466F2F9633E6836AD743
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Nuklearia ist als Pro-AKW-Bewegung nicht als Quelle geeignet, zumal diese auch mit Halb- und Unwahrheiten über den AKW-Betrieb aufgefallen sind.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764216944041861437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5AB61D1DCE1D1DF54E48730BF8B3DEB7AB034189AD1466F2F9633E6836AD743
  • createdAtMillis - 1709520883386
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1764216944041861437F5AB61D1DCE1D1DF54E48730BF8B3DEB7AB034189AD1466F2F9633E6836AD743