Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 05:06:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08A7E53E47D63352CFF33D6DA004093B958F4D319AC7497ADF05210A78880584
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is expressing an opinion of dismay at the subject of the article. The article depicted may contain errors. Singer may not be the author, who used a pseudonym. However the paper “Zoophilia Is Morally Permissible” is a real, non-satyrical published journal paper. https://twitter.com/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857?s=20 https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/3/2/255

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764144561247682601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08A7E53E47D63352CFF33D6DA004093B958F4D319AC7497ADF05210A78880584
  • createdAtMillis - 1709442385537
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176414456124768260108A7E53E47D63352CFF33D6DA004093B958F4D319AC7497ADF05210A78880584