Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 13:08:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A2F4549764C302B641F39686067A5D118BB4315D91F5506D504C1C3483E127F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The currently rated "Helpful" note that references foreignpolicy.com is not at all supported by the link. It's a book review that doesn't make the claim that the note claims it does. Meanwhile, the original claim made by David Sacks is accurate. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/why-nato-has-become-flash-point-russia-ukraine

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764142511533256791
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A2F4549764C302B641F39686067A5D118BB4315D91F5506D504C1C3483E127F
  • createdAtMillis - 1709471316810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17641425115332567917A2F4549764C302B641F39686067A5D118BB4315D91F5506D504C1C3483E127F