Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 13:19:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E055D16FAA9A4847B24F9729DD7EE7389A250F3A97A4F15F921D95549CB74E66
Participant Details

Original Note:

As context the actual court filing is helpful: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/musk-v-altman-openai-complaint-sf.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764085990409253104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E055D16FAA9A4847B24F9729DD7EE7389A250F3A97A4F15F921D95549CB74E66
  • createdAtMillis - 1709471986583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1764085990409253104E055D16FAA9A4847B24F9729DD7EE7389A250F3A97A4F15F921D95549CB74E66