Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 08:04:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D
Participant Details

Original Note:

As context the actual court filing is helpful: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/musk-v-altman-openai-complaint-sf.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764085990409253104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D
  • createdAtMillis - 1709453099962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176408599040925310443A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D