Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 03:25:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2074905425DDCC72E8B768CD1700C0BE1E6425769203BDB17498AAA858B1361D
Participant Details

Original Note:

As context the actual court filing is helpful: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/musk-v-altman-openai-complaint-sf.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764085990409253104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2074905425DDCC72E8B768CD1700C0BE1E6425769203BDB17498AAA858B1361D
  • createdAtMillis - 1709436348023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17640859904092531042074905425DDCC72E8B768CD1700C0BE1E6425769203BDB17498AAA858B1361D