Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 01:27:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Previous note is completely unneeded, as the noter admitted, because the article explains the situation in great detail. The post was simply summarizing the contents of the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764019747077664969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285
  • createdAtMillis - 1709429251673
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176401974707766496984A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285