Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 20:44:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D0146859B44CB2AABEF7BFBCE446FF8B15FD2E4C295A3990251BAD061B0A5A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Previous note is completely unneeded, as the noter admitted, because the article explains the situation in great detail. The post was simply summarizing the contents of the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1764019747077664969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D0146859B44CB2AABEF7BFBCE446FF8B15FD2E4C295A3990251BAD061B0A5A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1709412262140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17640197470776649694D0146859B44CB2AABEF7BFBCE446FF8B15FD2E4C295A3990251BAD061B0A5A7