Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 19:10:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5701ADC62644C7D8054283A1051C47B7F290598AAF28204EE66A968C72C36CD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, this is clearly an opinion. If you object, reply in comments. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/06/18/distinguishing-between-factual-and-opinion-statements-in-the-news/ https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/news/opinions-are-not-facts-how-scientific-curiosity-may-save-us

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763932779354444148
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5701ADC62644C7D8054283A1051C47B7F290598AAF28204EE66A968C72C36CD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1709406648210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17639327793544441485701ADC62644C7D8054283A1051C47B7F290598AAF28204EE66A968C72C36CD9