Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 20:25:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF2A948EFAD47F887019D658A0EE5903A1493E6ED65057CE04D85E6377B408DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post by Neale Harvey is factually correct, and adds important context in it's rebuttal to the false claim of a filibuster. The proposed CN is incorrect, and its sources are contradictory. This one counters the others, and supports the original tweet: https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/1750

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763913371521253576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF2A948EFAD47F887019D658A0EE5903A1493E6ED65057CE04D85E6377B408DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1709411153616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763913371521253576DF2A948EFAD47F887019D658A0EE5903A1493E6ED65057CE04D85E6377B408DE