Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-02 17:20:13 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0F129A5168BFA5F4331B0665D65B4E744CA795F384C73A8695C5A790CBBE12FF
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The original post by Neale Harvey is factually correct, and adds important context in it's rebuttal to the false claim of a filibuster. The proposed CN is incorrect, and its sources are contradictory. This one counters the others, and supports the original tweet: https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/1750
All Note Details