Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 20:59:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03100B1D5CC67AEAEAD208BF5C50E8B1F3DFE2217EA3AF4FFDCC4B829F04D1B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post by Neale Harvey is factually correct, and adds important context in it's rebuttal to the false claim of a filibuster. The proposed CN is incorrect, and its sources are contradictory. This one counters the others, and supports the original tweet: https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/1750

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763913371521253576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03100B1D5CC67AEAEAD208BF5C50E8B1F3DFE2217EA3AF4FFDCC4B829F04D1B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1709413172945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176391337152125357603100B1D5CC67AEAEAD208BF5C50E8B1F3DFE2217EA3AF4FFDCC4B829F04D1B0