Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 11:38:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06E1760130E8B271A7CC116306B487324653973F610775A76310517D204626BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was deemed inadmissible as it could not be authenticated. The text didn’t exist on Deuters devices & AH tried to submit it, not as a text- but as an Excel Document!! Had AH‘s team wished to make the jury aware of it they could have called SD to the stand. They didn’t! https://t.co/Fbb6T2zbS8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763854575159623822
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06E1760130E8B271A7CC116306B487324653973F610775A76310517D204626BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709379483381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176385457515962382206E1760130E8B271A7CC116306B487324653973F610775A76310517D204626BC