Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 16:28:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C57A460EE85C4791C0B7E2BA4AC24DD3A723D0E2383D9AC11BBD332600C13F22
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that postal voting is “clearly open to abuse”. In fact, the opposite is quite true. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/research-reports-and-data/electoral-fraud-data/2022-electoral-fraud-data

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763782652950163851
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C57A460EE85C4791C0B7E2BA4AC24DD3A723D0E2383D9AC11BBD332600C13F22
  • createdAtMillis - 1709396937061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763782652950163851C57A460EE85C4791C0B7E2BA4AC24DD3A723D0E2383D9AC11BBD332600C13F22