Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-02 09:44:01 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4E15FF1E8D1D952714CA212796631DE3816C6761A231E6F4AF08E67F9F92F01F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The statement that the Bill fell “because of filibustering” is false. A closure motion, which would have enabled a vote to pass second reading, failed because not enough MPs were present in the debate. That is why the Bill fell. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-03-01/division/C607EE37-ACC9-46BC-B0B4-04483D113F5A/ConversionPractices(Prohibition)Bill?outputType=Names
All Note Details