Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 01:33:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0BF9E60F65BE5C6197773E8D4BFA58155078CE99DAE342A8792B74EE038FC9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The OP was reporting in what repugnant view was voiced at this committee hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763578666443800905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0BF9E60F65BE5C6197773E8D4BFA58155078CE99DAE342A8792B74EE038FC9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709429614328
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763578666443800905E0BF9E60F65BE5C6197773E8D4BFA58155078CE99DAE342A8792B74EE038FC9A