Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 22:42:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5940ACD0D3FE476F1EA1E18A574BDE757A07C6ABBCA77253EA561F5A035CFE19
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The OP was reporting in what repugnant view was voiced at this committee hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763578666443800905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5940ACD0D3FE476F1EA1E18A574BDE757A07C6ABBCA77253EA561F5A035CFE19
  • createdAtMillis - 1709332947011
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17635786664438009055940ACD0D3FE476F1EA1E18A574BDE757A07C6ABBCA77253EA561F5A035CFE19