Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 10:29:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The OP was reporting in what repugnant view was voiced at this committee hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763578666443800905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1709461756920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176357866644380090529AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D