Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 16:17:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73D58D082C6D4AA2AD67572ED1415046A13D2138A58BB4ECF8DC8AA8A9F64656
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to this post, the appeals court determined this law was not discriminatory, stating the law did not violate “the unwritten principles of the Constitution, nor the constitutional architecture, nor any pre-Confederation law or principle having constitutional value” https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-appeal-court-decision-bill-21-1.7128447

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763578205732995549
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73D58D082C6D4AA2AD67572ED1415046A13D2138A58BB4ECF8DC8AA8A9F64656
  • createdAtMillis - 1709309838797
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176357820573299554973D58D082C6D4AA2AD67572ED1415046A13D2138A58BB4ECF8DC8AA8A9F64656