Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-05 19:10:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70CFD5D644826C834A732BB57CB8E1695463B6FF1EE18DD950CB0A928B4F6400
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article you shared in your note makes multiple references to the fact that they were indeed laid off (including in the title), directly contradicting your note. I mean, come on.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763574043377332685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 70CFD5D644826C834A732BB57CB8E1695463B6FF1EE18DD950CB0A928B4F6400
  • createdAtMillis - 1709665831873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176357404337733268570CFD5D644826C834A732BB57CB8E1695463B6FF1EE18DD950CB0A928B4F6400