Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 20:25:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C31B71AC54D8C6A4BDD2828B6046622CE55E06A77CD161F26F2D24F29681F2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article you shared in your note makes multiple references to the fact that they were indeed laid off (including in the title), directly contradicting your note. I mean, come on.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763574043377332685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C31B71AC54D8C6A4BDD2828B6046622CE55E06A77CD161F26F2D24F29681F2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1709324712140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17635740433773326850C31B71AC54D8C6A4BDD2828B6046622CE55E06A77CD161F26F2D24F29681F2F