Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 17:11:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CBFE9F58A6743869A8FA3B077645AF23A8577DC60DAF6D311471819CC4B66F2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gegen den Kernvorwurf des Correvtiv-Berichtes ist von Vosgerau nichtmals gerichtlich vorgegangen worden. Er hatte lediglich drei Nebenaspekte beklagt, in zwei Punkten aber verloren. Der Name von Klaus Nordmannn als Spender darf ebenfalls weiterhin genannt werden. https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/correctiv-gerichtsverfahren-n2-gernot-moerig-spende/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1763535818742759655
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CBFE9F58A6743869A8FA3B077645AF23A8577DC60DAF6D311471819CC4B66F2B
createdAtMillis - 1709313107975
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1763535818742759655CBFE9F58A6743869A8FA3B077645AF23A8577DC60DAF6D311471819CC4B66F2B