Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 17:26:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B86671E1FA78F0F9C329A71B8AA14C6BD241050340298C0984ABA75705261A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gegen den Kernvorwurf des Correvtiv-Berichtes ist nichtmals gerichtlich vorgegangen worden. Vosgerau hatte lediglich drei Nebenaspekte beklagt, in zwei Punkten aber verloren. Der Name von Klaus Nordmannn als Spender darf ebenfalls weiterhin genannt werden. https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/ https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/correctiv-gerichtsverfahren-n2-gernot-moerig-spende/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1763532828644360425
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8B86671E1FA78F0F9C329A71B8AA14C6BD241050340298C0984ABA75705261A9
createdAtMillis - 1709313996168
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17635328286443604258B86671E1FA78F0F9C329A71B8AA14C6BD241050340298C0984ABA75705261A9