Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-03 15:18:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN-Without a jury or social media campaign, multiple judges in the UK found 12 instances where JD had abused AH to be true.(https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2020/2911.html) They are investigating the impact social media had on the trial, whether you think it impacted the verdict or not can be debated in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763483000443195534
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
  • createdAtMillis - 1709479136997
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176348300044319553485ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A