Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 17:54:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 234F094A0699C9F97BDF30CE8D40ACC6C108C0E88B4B4458C0E88BB7AE61573C
Participant Details

Original Note:

STOP USING CNs ON OPINIONS AND SPECULATIONS! National Review is speculating and expressing an opinion. It's literally what they do. The proposed note ALSO speculates and opines. That belongs in direct replies to the original post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763477743923286155
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 234F094A0699C9F97BDF30CE8D40ACC6C108C0E88B4B4458C0E88BB7AE61573C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709574868360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763477743923286155234F094A0699C9F97BDF30CE8D40ACC6C108C0E88B4B4458C0E88BB7AE61573C