Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 18:07:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3D6785C8DBA13DAA597A4830638671E8134F88D2795CB15F8ABD223BFEF1017
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ginni Thomas has no stake in the case. She is not a defendant and has not presented any arguments before the Court. There is no justifiable material reason for Justice Thomas to recuse himself. https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/10/no-justice-clarence-thomas-doesnt-have-to-recuse-because-his-wife-has-political-opinions/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763443865799794856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3D6785C8DBA13DAA597A4830638671E8134F88D2795CB15F8ABD223BFEF1017
  • createdAtMillis - 1709316423894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1763443865799794856F3D6785C8DBA13DAA597A4830638671E8134F88D2795CB15F8ABD223BFEF1017