Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 17:03:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4CD0B3E0974176E01DADBF06E052D97125FF4976E30B61492D56FAB4F470F1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ginni Thomas has no stake in the case. She is not a defendant and has not presented any arguments before the Court. There is no justifiable material reason for Justice Thomas to recuse himself. https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/10/no-justice-clarence-thomas-doesnt-have-to-recuse-because-his-wife-has-political-opinions/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763443865799794856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4CD0B3E0974176E01DADBF06E052D97125FF4976E30B61492D56FAB4F470F1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710695029725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1763443865799794856D4CD0B3E0974176E01DADBF06E052D97125FF4976E30B61492D56FAB4F470F1C