Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 01:54:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3400C8652AA0C97AE8741B499F1125AEE63C8DEED4B017A9F0BDF6AB3B5ED840
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: the "public interest" in a "timely resolution" of criminal cases—in law, an "interest" is not a "right," the right to a "speedy trial" is the name for a specific right in the Constitution, and the "public interest" is general, not for a specific case. I'm a lawyer. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/02/jack_smith_will_annoy_the_supreme_court.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763257582209118255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3400C8652AA0C97AE8741B499F1125AEE63C8DEED4B017A9F0BDF6AB3B5ED840
  • createdAtMillis - 1709258096862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17632575822091182553400C8652AA0C97AE8741B499F1125AEE63C8DEED4B017A9F0BDF6AB3B5ED840