Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 16:49:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8B5F098591F7DBFC587E73843638FCFA59A414D2E34FCE18E7BF1B626ECC986
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est utile d'apporter un contexte à cette information sans pour autant la réfuter. Libération l'a d'ailleurs indiqué dans un tweet, le chiffre est invérifiable et fourni par une entité partie prenante. https://x.com/libe/status/1763108089753182290?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763210332414026204
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8B5F098591F7DBFC587E73843638FCFA59A414D2E34FCE18E7BF1B626ECC986
  • createdAtMillis - 1709225363119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1763210332414026204E8B5F098591F7DBFC587E73843638FCFA59A414D2E34FCE18E7BF1B626ECC986