Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 18:35:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anat Schwartz was not attacked, her propaganda was. So far no credible resource confirms any story that she's written. Moreover, Anat is a former IDF Intel official, so conflict of interest exist. https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/ https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1761740292015767736?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763202463505494088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1709231738001
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17632024635054940881DF87FBC3D4050F4B5B0836C40FFE7F009140AF98A0ECB8EDF0067DD46D902AB