Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 20:41:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14DEBC440CB7E4D9BAF8532494C6C772768F82DFAE5143E716E24DEB7D367DAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anat Schwartz was not attacked, her propaganda was. So far no credible resource confirms any story that she's written. Moreover, Anat is a former IDF Intel official, so conflict of interest exist. https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/ https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1761740292015767736?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763202463505494088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14DEBC440CB7E4D9BAF8532494C6C772768F82DFAE5143E716E24DEB7D367DAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1709239312100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176320246350549408814DEBC440CB7E4D9BAF8532494C6C772768F82DFAE5143E716E24DEB7D367DAF