Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 11:09:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66738D19152A572F602AE344CB1450EE27AEBE0DDBE951C2192A74D11B63A3E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le post ne contient aucune fausse information ni contenu trompeur et demande pourquoi son accréditation et la possibilité même de la demander lui a été retiré. Le renvois vers son statut d'ex correspondant de RT est un commentaire et non une note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763151638347272243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66738D19152A572F602AE344CB1450EE27AEBE0DDBE951C2192A74D11B63A3E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1709204966478
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176315163834727224366738D19152A572F602AE344CB1450EE27AEBE0DDBE951C2192A74D11B63A3E5