Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 15:24:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 631727D267B578353A0FCE41D6FF846268F4CDB0B6AC41DCE4BE358E73690103
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The verdict has already been reached. Existing note doesn't even belong in the comments as contempt of court only applies to future or ongoing cases. https://www.gov.uk/contempt-of-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763140370186018909
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 631727D267B578353A0FCE41D6FF846268F4CDB0B6AC41DCE4BE358E73690103
  • createdAtMillis - 1709220241910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763140370186018909631727D267B578353A0FCE41D6FF846268F4CDB0B6AC41DCE4BE358E73690103