Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 11:40:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The verdict has already been reached. Existing note doesn't even belong in the comments as contempt of court only applies to future or ongoing cases. https://www.gov.uk/contempt-of-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763140370186018909
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1709206805196
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176314037018601890907F59B0C8FFC247E89C1EF4581534B428B38E29FF23F85D37C5023868C776FE1