Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 13:32:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA6480CF91320177D57A7B34F6931D5FACD522EBE79DA1636316F6A072300B93
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note does not address the claims made in the original tweet, nor does it contextualise them. Questions have been raised on the reporting of the NYT on the story it ran on sexual assaults on October 7th, around evidence and journalistic integrity https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763122569949913286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA6480CF91320177D57A7B34F6931D5FACD522EBE79DA1636316F6A072300B93
  • createdAtMillis - 1709213527684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763122569949913286FA6480CF91320177D57A7B34F6931D5FACD522EBE79DA1636316F6A072300B93